Pulling current player details into Tactico.


Sums exactly — base plus adjustments equals the score. Deterministic, versioned, never AI-generated. Full method →
Percentiles vs 587 strikers in our scored set (degenerate rows excluded from both sides)
Generated Aug 3, 2026, 11:01 AM · Three-agent consensus
This striker shows below-baseline production across key attacking metrics. Goals/90 of 0.21 is well below expectation for the position (elite strikers typically exceed 0.5+). Assists/90 at 0.10 is minimal. The finishing score of 33.32 flags poor conversion efficiency. Creation score of 25.6 and progression score of 30.13 indicate limited involvement in buildup. Key passes/90 at 1.05 shows some creative contribution but insufficient to compensate for low goal output. Physical duel score of 27.96 suggests weakness in hold-up play and aerial battles—critical for strikers. Critical data gaps exist: shotsTotal, bigChancesCreated, and bigChancesMissed are all null, preventing full assessment of shot volume and chance quality. Tackles/90 at 1.46 shows defensive work rate but is not a primary striker metric. The overall FQ score of 57.44 and current form of 60.31 reflect mediocre underlying performance. High confidence (0.72) and completeness (0.91) support reliability, but the production volume and efficiency are clearly inadequate for a striker.
Current form score (60.31) is 2.87 points above the multi-season Tactico Score (57.44), indicating a modest improving trajectory. Score confidence of 0.72 suggests a reasonable sample size, though not extensive. For a striker, the sub-scores reveal significant volatility: finishing (33.32), creation (25.6), progression (30.13), and physical duels (27.96) are all weak, while defense (49.82) is relatively stronger but less relevant to the role. This wide variance—especially the low finishing score for a striker—signals inconsistent output and role-specific underperformance. Data completeness is strong at 91%, with only nationality missing, so availability is not a concern. The form improvement is real but modest, and the underlying consistency issues—particularly in core striker dimensions—present moderate reliability risk. Overall: slight upward form trend tempered by volatile, below-average production across key attacking metrics.
ImprovingThe role bucket 'STRIKER' is clearly defined, reducing role ambiguity. However, the FQ Score of 57.44 sits in the mid-range, suggesting a moderate-difficulty league environment—neither elite nor low-tier. The sub-score profile reveals significant weaknesses: finishing (33.32) and physical duel (27.96) scores are notably low for a striker, which may indicate either a low-difficulty league where even modest production yields average scores, or a challenging environment where the player struggles. The physical profile is entirely null (aerials, duels, clearances, big chances created all missing), preventing verification of role alignment and limiting environmental read. Data completeness is strong at 91%, suggesting a stable sample, but the absence of physical metrics creates a blind spot. The small gap between FQ Score (57.44) and form score (60.31) suggests contextual stability. Overall, the context is difficult to assess confidently: role clarity is present, but the null physical profile and mid-range scoring in a striker role raise questions about league difficulty and whether the environment flatters or challenges the player.
Challenging contextA Bundesliga striker sitting at 57.44 on the Tactico Scale — squarely in the typical-performer band — whose most distinctive feature is how little attacking output he generates for his position. Across 861 minutes this season, he has managed just 0.21 goals per 90 and 0.10 assists per 90, well below what the striker role demands. Every core attacking sub-score — finishing (33.32), creation (25.6), progression (30.13), physical duels (27.96) — falls below baseline, painting a consistent picture of a striker who is not yet delivering at Bundesliga starter level.
The finishing sub-score of 33.32 is the primary anchor dragging this score down — it is the most role-critical dimension for a striker and sits firmly in the clear-weakness tier. The creation (25.6) and progression (30.13) sub-scores compound the issue, meaning he neither scores nor meaningfully contributes to build-up play.
Form score of 60.31 sits just 2.87 points above the Tactico Score of 57.44 — within the ±5 stable band, so this is not a meaningful upward trend. The trajectory is essentially flat, with no strong signal of acceleration or decline.
Dia's Tactico Score of 56.93 places him in the same typical-performer band, with a similarly modest attacking return; the key difference is that Dia brings more physical presence in duels, whereas this player's physical duel score (27.96) is a more pronounced weakness.
Tel scores 55.79 and shares a profile of limited minutes and below-baseline finishing output; Tel's age profile introduces more developmental upside, which is a meaningful distinction.
Hountondji's 59.61 is the closest ceiling in this comparable set, sitting just above this player's 57.44; Hountondji edges ahead primarily on defensive contribution metrics, a dimension where this player's 1.46 tackles per 90 is actually his relative strength.
| Season | Competition | Apps | Min | G | A | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Bundesliga | 32 | 861 | 2 | 1 | 6.90 |
| — | Bundesliga | 18 | 1,003 | 2 | 2 | 6.90 |
| Career | ||||||
A finishing sub-score of 33.32 is a clear weakness for any striker. His 0.21 goals per 90 across 32 appearances (861 minutes) reflects poor conversion efficiency, though the absence of shot volume and big-chance data prevents a full picture of whether this is a volume or accuracy problem.
A physical duel sub-score of 27.96 signals meaningful weakness in the aerial and contact dimensions that are central to a striker's role. All aerial and duel raw metrics are null, so this flag is based on the composite score alone — evidence is partial but directionally consistent.
Creation (25.6) and progression (30.13) sub-scores are both below baseline, indicating limited involvement in build-up. His 1.05 key passes per 90 provides some creative contribution but is insufficient to compensate for the lack of goal threat.
Top 50 players by Tactico Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
Tactico Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side.
Every Tactico Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology.
Paste, screenshot, or build your 15 — Scout ranks your XI and captain with an xPts model validated on four seasons. Its own squad is committed before every deadline on the official game. No account required.
| 50 |
| 1,864 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 6.90 |
| Opponent | Rat* | Min | G | A | Sh | xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vsHertha BSC3-1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
*Rating = SportMonks metric
| Season | League | Apps | Min | G | A | xG | xA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021/2022 | Bundesliga | 32 | 861 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| 2020/2021 | Bundesliga | 18 | 1003 | 2 | 2 | — | — |