Pulling current player details into Tactico.


Sums exactly — base plus adjustments equals the score. Deterministic, versioned, never AI-generated. Full method →
Percentiles vs 608 goalkeepers in our scored set (degenerate rows excluded from both sides)
A mid-range Bundesliga goalkeeper with an FQ Score of 55.59, placing him in the typical performer band on the 0-100 scale. With 1,934 minutes across 22 matches this season, he is a regular starter but the data lacks goalkeeper-specific metrics — saves, save percentage, and clean sheets are all absent — making a full quality assessment impossible. What is available points to a functional, unspectacular presence between the posts.
The 55.59 FQ Score is driven primarily by the absence of any positive signal from goalkeeper-specific sub-scores, all of which are null. Without save percentage, goals prevented above expected, or a defensive sub-score, the model can only anchor to baseline positional contribution — and nothing in the available data pushes the score above that floor.
Form score of 58.25 sits 2.66 points above the FQ Score of 55.59 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful directional shift. Trajectory is flat-to-marginally improving, with no data suggesting an acceleration in either direction.
Johnstone's FQ Score of 54.71 is nearly identical, reflecting a similar profile of regular starting minutes without standout metric-driven differentiation; the key difference is Johnstone operates in a higher-profile league context which may suppress his score relative to underlying quality.
Dimitrievski's 53.74 FQ Score places him in the same typical-performer band, making him a close stylistic peer; he scores marginally lower, suggesting slightly less consistent baseline contribution over the measured period.
Escandell Banacloche's 53.27 FQ Score is the lowest of the three comparables, sitting about 2.3 points below this player's mark, indicating a similar ceiling but a slightly weaker overall output baseline.
| Season | Competition | Apps | Min | G | A | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Bundesliga | 33 | 2,970 | — | — | 6.84 |
| — | Bundesliga | 22 | 1,934 | — | — | 6.94 |
| — |
Save percentage, clean sheet rate, and goals prevented above expected are all missing from the dataset. With only a 6.94 average match rating and 0.05 key passes per 90 as available signals, there is no evidence of above-baseline shot-stopping or distribution quality — the core dimensions that separate good goalkeepers from adequate ones.
Top 50 players by Tactico Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
Tactico Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side.
Every Tactico Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology.
Paste, screenshot, or build your 15 — Scout ranks your XI and captain with an xPts model validated on four seasons. Its own squad is committed before every deadline on the official game. No account required.
| Bundesliga |
| 14 |
| 1,260 |
| — |
| — |
| 6.94 |
| — | Bundesliga | 24 | 2,160 | — | — | 6.68 |
| Career | 93 | 8,324 | 0 | 0 | 6.84 | |
| Season | League | Apps | Min | G | A | xG | xA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018/2019 | Bundesliga | 22 | 1934 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017/2018 | Bundesliga | 24 | 2160 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016/2017 | Bundesliga | 14 | 1260 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015/2016 | Bundesliga | 33 | 2970 | — | — | — | — |