Pulling current player details into Tactico.


A Bundesliga center back sitting at 50.61 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical-performer tier and below baseline for a starting defender in a top-five league. The most notable data point is what is absent: all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duel, possession control) are null, meaning the 50.61 reflects a profile built on limited dimensional signal. With 1,915 minutes across 22 matches, sample size is not the issue — the score simply reflects a player operating at or below positional expectations.
The FQ score of 50.61 is anchored by the absence of any sub-score above baseline and a per-90 profile that offers little separation: 1.64 tackles per 90 and a 6.99 average match rating are functional but unremarkable for a Bundesliga center back. Without a standout defensive or ball-playing dimension to pull the score upward, the composite settles at the midpoint of the typical-performer band.
At 48.94, the form score sits 1.67 points below the FQ score of 50.61 — within the ±5 stable range, but directionally soft. This is a stable-to-marginally-declining profile with no momentum in either direction.
Diks (50.48 FQ) is the closest match by overall score, reflecting a similarly functional but undistinguished defensive profile; the key difference is Diks operates as a fullback, giving his comparable score a different positional context.
Dźwigała (50.11 FQ) mirrors the same typical-performer tier as a center back, making him the most role-equivalent comparison; both sit below the 60-69 adequate-starter threshold that would indicate a reliable top-league starter.
Kolašinac (50.04 FQ) rounds out the peer group at a near-identical score level; unlike this player, Kolašinac brings a known physical and aerial profile that partially explains his score, whereas the data here lacks that sub-score confirmation.
All defensive sub-scores (defense, physical duel) are null despite 1,915 minutes played. For a center back, this means the core of the positional evaluation — duels, interceptions, aerial work — cannot be verified, and the available signal (1.64 tackles per 90, 6.99 rating) does not indicate above-baseline contribution.
Key passes sit at just 0.14 per 90 and assists data is absent. For a modern Bundesliga center back where ball-playing ability is increasingly valued, this is a meaningful gap — there is no evidence of progressive passing or build-up contribution in the data.
Top 50 players by Tactico Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
Tactico Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side.
Every Tactico Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology.