Pulling current player details into Tactico.


A central midfielder in Serie A sitting at 54.92 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical-performer band. The most distinctive feature of this profile is not a strength but an absence: all role-critical sub-scores (creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning the score is built on surface-level output rather than dimensional analysis. With 1,799 minutes across 29 matches, the sample is meaningful but the picture remains incomplete.
The 54.92 FQ Score reflects a player meeting baseline expectations without standing out in any measurable dimension. The absence of all sub-scores — finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, and physical duels — means the score is anchored primarily to per-90 surface stats (0.05 goals, 0.20 assists, 2.5 key passes, 1.8 tackles) rather than deeper role contribution, which caps confidence in the rating.
Form score of 54.75 sits just 0.17 below the FQ Score of 54.92 — a delta of -0.2, well within the ±5 stable band. There is no upward or downward signal; performance has been flat and consistent across the current season.
McGinn's FQ score of 55.25 places him in the same typical-performer band, reflecting similar surface-level output in a central midfield role; McGinn, however, operates in a higher-profile league context which may suppress his score relative to underlying contribution.
García Serrano scores 56.98, the closest ceiling comparison, with a similar profile of steady midfield presence; he edges ahead likely on stronger progressive and possession metrics that are absent from this player's data packet.
Parejo's 52.26 sits just below, making him the floor comparison in this peer group; both share a passing-oriented midfield profile, but Parejo's lower score suggests either reduced minutes, form decline, or a more demanding competitive environment.
0.05 goals and 0.20 assists per 90 are low for a central midfielder expected to contribute to build-up and chance creation. 2.5 key passes per 90 is the one surface metric with some weight, but without a creation sub-score to contextualise it, its quality and difficulty-adjusted value cannot be confirmed.
All six sub-scores are null. For a central midfielder — a role where creation, progression, and defensive work are core evaluation pillars — this means the 54.92 score carries meaningful uncertainty. The 0.64 confidence rating reflects this thin evidence ceiling explicitly.
Top 50 players by Tactico Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
Tactico Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side.
Every Tactico Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology.