Pulling current player details into Tactico.


A Serie A center-back sitting at 49.24 on the FQ scale — squarely in the fringe-to-typical range — with 32 appearances and 2,809 minutes this season providing a reliable sample. The most distinctive feature here is not a strength but a data gap: all positional sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, meaning the score is driven by aggregate signal rather than granular role metrics. At 0.06 goals per 90 and 0.06 key passes per 90, attacking contribution is negligible, as expected for the role.
The FQ score of 49.24 reflects sustained below-baseline output for a center-back, with a per-90 tackle rate of 2.18 and an average match rating of 6.72 as the primary visible indicators. The absence of granular defensive sub-scores prevents pinpointing a single driver, but the aggregate signal — consistent across a 32-match sample with 0.93 confidence — places this player firmly in the typical-to-fringe band.
Form score of 48.83 sits just 0.41 points below the FQ score of 49.24 — well within the ±5 stable band. This is not a temporary dip; the near-identical values across a 32-match season indicate flat, predictable output with no meaningful upward or downward momentum.
Comparable FQ scores (49.62 vs 49.24) place both players in the same typical-to-fringe band for center-backs; Alderete edges slightly higher on the overall scale.
Nearly identical FQ score (48.49) signals a similar performance tier for a defensive role; Cabrera sits marginally below on the aggregate measure.
Kolašinac's 50.04 FQ score is the closest ceiling in this peer group, though his positional profile as a more attack-oriented defender likely drives a different sub-score distribution.
Top 50 players by Tactico Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
Tactico Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side.
Every Tactico Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology.